What should the court reporter do if an original exhibit is missing after a deposition?

Prepare for the NVRA Court Reporter Ethics and Professional Practice Exam with our engaging study tools. Dive into diverse question formats and enhance your understanding with detailed explanations and tips. Achieve success and confidence on test day!

In situations where an original exhibit is missing after a deposition, the court reporter has a responsibility to take proactive measures to resolve the issue. Contacting the taking attorney immediately is crucial for several reasons. First, it allows for prompt communication about a significant aspect of the deposition, facilitating the attorney's ability to address the missing exhibit with the parties involved. This action helps prevent any delays in the legal process that could arise from the absence of important evidence.

By bringing the situation to the attorney's attention right away, the court reporter ensures that necessary steps can be taken to locate the missing exhibit or, if needed, to prepare an alternative course of action. This communication not only demonstrates the court reporter's professionalism but also fosters a collaborative environment among legal participants to maintain the integrity of the proceedings.

The other options do not promote the same level of diligence. Ignoring the situation or waiting for the attorney to report the issue could lead to significant complications in the case, including potential legal ramifications if the exhibit is crucial for a decision. Filing a missing report with the court could also be a step in the process, but it typically comes after efforts to resolve the matter through communication with the attorney have been made. Thus, immediate contact with the taking attorney is the most appropriate

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy