What should be included in the transcript if an attorney makes remarks about a deponent's absence?

Including the remarks regarding attempts to contact the deponent in the transcript is essential because it provides a complete and accurate account of the context surrounding the deponent's absence. These remarks are factual and relevant to the proceedings, as they may influence the perception of the case or the deponent's credibility. It's important for the transcript to reflect any actions taken by the attorneys to communicate with the deponent, as this can be pertinent information for the record.

In contrast, remarks about scheduling issues may not be substantive enough to warrant inclusion in the official record, as they often pertain to logistics rather than the substance of the testimony. The attorney's opinion on the deponent is subjective and does not contribute to the factual record necessary for the legal proceedings. Lastly, a formal apology from the attorney, while perhaps polite, does not hold relevance in the transcript since it does not serve to document the case facts or provide insight into procedural matters concerning the deponent's absence. Having these distinctions clear helps to maintain the integrity and focus of the transcript on significant factual elements.