What should a reporter do if they are asked to change a transcript after finalization?

When a reporter is asked to change a transcript after it has been finalized, the most appropriate course of action is to adhere to the ethical obligation against alteration unless there is a judicial order or formal request. This principle is rooted in maintaining the integrity and accuracy of the official record. Court reporters play a critical role in creating a reliable and authentic account of proceedings, and any alteration could compromise that integrity.

Altering a transcript without formal justification could lead to serious ethical violations and legal repercussions, including the potential to mislead courts or parties involved. Therefore, it is essential for reporters to maintain strict adherence to ethical guidelines, which prioritize the accuracy and reliability of their work.

While considering the request might seem reasonable, it is essential to prioritize ethical obligations and legal requirements over subjective evaluations of a change's importance. Changes made purely based on feeling or personal judgment can risk undermining the credibility of the transcript. Documenting requests without compliance is also a valuable practice; however, it does not align with the fundamental ethical duty to refuse unauthorized changes, which is why focusing on adherence to established guidelines is paramount.