What should a court reporter do if they are asked to read back testimony?

When a court reporter is asked to read back testimony, it is important for them to remind the parties not to resume questioning until they are prepared to report. This practice helps maintain the integrity of the record and ensures that all testimony is accurately documented. By communicating this to the parties, the court reporter sets the stage for a clear and organized process, making sure that the reading is done in a manner that upholds the accuracy and flow of the proceedings. This approach also allows for any necessary pauses or clarifications, contributing to the precision and professionalism expected in court reporting.

Reading back testimony immediately without warning could disrupt the flow of questioning and create confusion in the proceedings. Ignoring the request until after the session could lead to misunderstandings or lost opportunities for clarification during the trial. Transcribing only relevant parts might risk omitting important context that is necessary for understanding the full scope of the testimony. Therefore, the practice of reminding the parties not to continue questioning ensures that the court reporter can perform their responsibilities effectively and uphold the standards of their profession.