What must happen if the court reporter is in a different location from the witness?

When a court reporter is in a different location from the witness, the proper procedure requires that the witness must be sworn in by someone who is physically present with them. This is essential to ensure the integrity of the testimony being given, as the act of swearing is meant to affirm the truthfulness of the witness's statements under oath.

By having a representative present with the witness to administer the oath, it ensures that the legal requirements of the deposition or testimony are met, safeguarding the validity of the proceedings. This procedure maintains the ethical standards and practices within court reporting, as it upholds the necessity of a formal oath taken under the appropriate conditions.

The other choices do not align with the established legal protocols regarding witnesses. For instance, proceeding without swearing the witness is not permissible, as this undermines the oath's purpose. Delaying the proceedings until everyone is together might not be feasible or practical, especially if remote appearances are common. Lastly, requiring a witness to sign a waiver does not fulfill the necessary legal requirement of the swearing-in process.