What ethical dilemmas can arise from personal relationships with attorneys?

The potential for bias and questions of impartiality is a critical ethical dilemma that can arise when a court reporter has personal relationships with attorneys. Such relationships might lead to perceptions, or even actual instances, where the reporter's objectivity could be compromised. For example, if a court reporter has a close friendship with an attorney representing a party in a case, there may be concerns that the reporter could favor that attorney's arguments or implicate their own judgement when capturing the proceedings.

Impartiality is a cornerstone of court reporting and ensuring a fair legal process. Any appearance of bias, even if unintentional, can undermine the integrity of the legal record and the trust that parties have in the judicial system. Thus, maintaining professional boundaries is essential to uphold the ethical standards expected in the profession.