What action should a court reporter take if an attorney objects to the method of reporting?

When an attorney objects to the method of reporting, the appropriate action for a court reporter is to note the objection in the record and continue the deposition. This approach ensures that the record accurately reflects any concerns raised during the proceedings, while also maintaining the flow of the deposition. By documenting the objection, the court reporter provides clarity for any potential review or disputes that may arise later regarding the method used for reporting.

Continuing the deposition after noting the objection ensures that the proceedings can move forward without unnecessary interruption, which is critical in maintaining the efficiency of legal processes. This action also protects the integrity of the record for later scrutiny, if needed.

Other options, while they might seem reasonable at first glance, could lead to complications or interruptions in the legal process. For instance, stopping the deposition until the issue is resolved could prolong proceedings unnecessarily, while simply continuing without acknowledging the objection compromises record-keeping accuracy and could omit important context. Consulting with the court about the objection might also interrupt the deposition flow when it may be more efficient to address it after the session has concluded. Therefore, recording the objection while continuing with the deposition strikes a balance between thorough documentation and maintaining procedural efficiency.