If a court reporter has doubts about what should be recorded, what is the best course of action?

When a court reporter has doubts about what should be recorded, seeking clarification from the court or the attorney for direction is the most effective course of action. This approach ensures that the reporter accurately captures the proceedings and adheres to the legal standards required in that particular context.

Engaging with the court or attorney not only provides clarity on what needs to be documented but also fosters a collaborative relationship, demonstrating professionalism and a commitment to the integrity of the record. By doing so, the reporter can avoid potential misunderstandings or errors that could impact the integrity of the transcript. It affirms the reporter's role as an impartial and accurate recorder of the proceedings.

This choice also reflects an understanding of the responsibilities of a court reporter, emphasizing the importance of communication within the courtroom setting. In the legal field, accuracy and clarity are paramount, making it vital for a reporter to address any uncertainties head-on rather than proceeding alone without guidance.