How can court reporters ensure their transcripts are accurate?

Ensuring the accuracy of transcripts is a fundamental responsibility of court reporters, and reviewing notes and audio recordings is a critical step in achieving this goal. This practice allows court reporters to cross-check their written records against the original source material, which can include audio recordings of the proceedings. By doing so, they can identify any discrepancies or errors in their transcription and make necessary corrections before finalizing the document. This thorough review process helps maintain the integrity of the transcript, ensuring that it accurately reflects the spoken words and proceedings of the court.

Relying solely on memory, as suggested in one of the choices, poses a significant risk of inaccuracy, as human recollection can be flawed or incomplete. Seeking validation from attorneys can be beneficial, but ultimately, it is the court reporter's responsibility to ensure the transcript's fidelity through their own diligence and verification methods. Asking the judge for approval of notes is not an established or necessary step in the process of ensuring accuracy, as the court reporter must independently verify their work rather than relying on the judge’s approval of their notes.