Can court reporters discuss ongoing proceedings?

The choice indicating that court reporters cannot discuss ongoing proceedings is grounded in the ethical standards upheld in the profession. Court reporters are expected to maintain strict confidentiality regarding the proceedings they transcribe. This obligation is crucial for preserving the integrity of the judicial process, protecting the rights of the parties involved, and ensuring that sensitive information is not disclosed to unauthorized individuals.

Confidentiality helps maintain the fairness of trials, as discussions about ongoing cases can potentially influence public opinion or the juror pool, leading to bias or prejudice. Additionally, ethical guidelines set by various court reporting associations and state regulations reinforce the necessity for court reporters to refrain from discussing any details of ongoing proceedings.

While there may be situations where consent exists, or discussions can happen among reporters or privately, the foundational rule of confidentiality takes precedence. Therefore, the position that court reporters cannot discuss ongoing proceedings is the most supported and ethically sound response.