Can a court reporter provide a transcript to one side of the case before the other?

The principle behind providing transcripts to all parties simultaneously is rooted in the concepts of fairness and impartiality in the judicial process. Court reporters have an ethical obligation to ensure that all parties involved in a legal proceeding have equal access to the same information. This is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the court system, as it prevents any party from gaining an undue advantage over another.

Providing a transcript to one side before the other could lead to potential misuse or misinterpretation of the information, which may influence the proceedings and affect the outcomes. By ensuring that all parties receive the transcript at the same time, the court reporter upholds the ethical standards of the profession and contributes to a fair judicial process.

This approach aligns with the principles of transparency and equal treatment in legal proceedings, which are essential for maintaining public confidence in the judicial system. Other options suggest scenarios where disparity in access could occur, undermining this ethical standard.